Teacher qualification, experience, capability beliefs and professional development: Do they predict teacher adoption of 21st century pedagogies?
Teacher qualification, experience, capability beliefs and professional development
AbstractThe primary objective of the study is to unravel the role played by selected teacher variables in adoption of 21st century pedagogies in Kisii County, Kenya. We hypothesized that there is no statistically significant relationship between the teacher characteristics and adoption of 21st century pedagogies. Convergent parallel mixed method design was employed in this research. A randomized sample of science teachers (n=184) was used to avail required data. Ordinal logistic regression was used to establish to what extent the teacher variables predicted teacher adoption of 21st century pedagogies. The final model statistically significantly predicted the dependent variable over and above the intercept-only model. We conclude that the teacher characteristics investigated do inform teacher adoption of 21st century pedagogies. Policy implications suggest that the Ministry of Education should strive to ensure quality pre-service teacher education, engender teacher motivation to better teacher beliefs/attitudes and also invest in teacher professional development-all which we consider fundamental determinants of teacher adoption of 21st century pedagogies.
Agresti, A(2010). Analysis of ordinal categorical data (2nd ed.). John Willy & Sons.
Alan, S. M., & Lisa, B. S. (2014). Is transfer of training related to firm performance?
International Journal of Training and Development, 18(2). https://10.1111/ijtd.12029
Allinder, M. R. (1994).The relationship between teacher efficacy and instructional practices of special education teachers and consultants. Journal of Teacher Education and Special education , 17(2), 86-95
Altinyelken, K.H. (2013).Teachers principled resistance to curriculum change: A compelling case from Turkey.
Areekkuzhiyil, S. (2014). Attitude of teachers the restructured curriculum at undergraduate level in kerala. Journal of research, Extent ion and development,t 2(5).
Baldwin, T. T. Ford, K. J & Blume, B. D. (2009). Transfer of training 1988 - 2008:
An updated review and agenda for future research. Journal of Industrial
and Organizational Psychology 24, 41-70. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9780470745267.ch2
CEMASTEA, (2015). Training report for primary ASAL INSET. Ministry of Education. http://www.cemastea.ac.ke
CEMASTEA (2016a). Secondary school principals' workshop report. https:www.cemastea.ac.ke
CEMASTEA (2016b). Report on secondary school - based INSET through lesson study, Ministry of Education. https://www.cemastea.ac.ke.lessonstudyreport_final.pdf
Cohen, D. K. & Spillane, J. P. (1992). Policy and practice: The relation between governance and instruction. Review of Research in Education 18, 3-49.
Cresswel, J. W. (2014). Research design: qualitative and mixed method approaches (4th ed.), CA sage.
Crittenden, L. V., & Wilson, T. E. (2005). Content, pedagogy and learning outcomes in the international marketing course. Journal of Teaching in International Business, 17(1-2), 81-101. https://doi.org/10.1300/J066v17n01_05
Darling-Harmond, L. (2002). Teacher equality and student achievement: a review of state policy evidence. Journal of education policy analysis 8(1).
Darlind-Hammond, L., Hyler, M. E. and Gardener, M. (2017). Effective teacher professional development. Palo Alto, CA: Learning policy Institute. https://learningpolicyinstitute.org/products/teacher-prof-dev.
Donovan P., Darcy, D. (2011). Learning transfer: The views of practitioners in Ireland. International Journal of Training and Development,5(2).
Erringaton, E. (2004).The impact of teacher beliefs on flexible learning innovations: Some practices and possibilities for academic developments. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 41(1), 39-47. https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/470329032000172702
Freire, P. (1970).Pedagogy of the oppressed. Herder and Herder.
Garcia, C. (2003). The Effects of teacher attitudes, experiences and background knowledge on the use of inquiry method of teaching in the elementary classroom. www.nmu.edu/webb
Garet, M. S., Porter, C. A., Beatrice, F. B., & Yoon K. S. (2001). What Makes Professional Development Effective: Result From a National Sample of Teachers. http://www.sstog.org/stable/3202507
Gregoire, M. (2003). Is it a challenge or a threat? A dual- process model of teacher’s cognitive and appraisal processes during conceptual changes. Education psychology review, 15, 147-179
Guskey, T. (1988). Teacher self-efficacy, self-concept and attitudes towards the implementation of instructional innovation. Journal of Teaching and Teacher Education, 4(1), 63- 69 https://doi.org/10.1016/0742-051x(88)90025-x
Guzdial, M. & Ni, L. (2007). What makes Teachers Change? Factors that Influence post – Secondary Teachers Adoption Of New Computing Curricular. Technical Report GT-IC-08-02.Washington: MITRE
Hosmer, D. W., Lemeshow, S., & Sturdivant, R. X. (2013). Applied logistic regression (3rd ed.).John Willy & Sons.
Johansson, S., Myrberg, E. (2019). The role of teacher characteristics in student achievement in mathematics and student perceptions of instructional quality. Education Inquiry, 10 (4), 275-299.
Kamamia, L. N., Ngugi,T. N., Thinguri, W. R. (2014). Establihment of the extent to which the subject mastery enhances quality teaching to student-teacher during teaching practice. Internatinational journal of Education and Research , 2(7), 641-660.
Katie, L. A. (2015). Teacher’s perceptions of examining students’ thinking: changing mathematics instructional practice. Congent Education, 2 (1).
https://doi.org/10.1080/23311/186 x. 2015 .1075329
Kiamba, W. E., Mutua, F. (2017). A critical review of the effect of teacher preparedness on students’ academic achievement: A research agenda. Scholarly Research Journal for Interdisciplinary Studies, 4(37).
Kimani, G., Kara, M.A. & Njagi, L. (2013). Teacher factors influencing student academic achievement in secondary schools in Nyandarua CountyKenya. Internal Journal of Education and Research.1(3), 1-14. http://hdl.handle.net/11295/81678
Kleinbaum, D. G., & Klein, M. (2010). Logistic regression (3rd ed.). Springer
Kothari, C. R. (2004). Research methodology: Methods and techniques. 2nd Edition, New Age International Publishers.
kul, U. & Cellik, S. (2017). Exploration of pre-service teachers’ beliefs in relation to mathematics teaching activities in classroom –based setting. International journal of research in Education and science 3(1), 345-2579220cdd79af8493423ea42123e30d53b64d5pdf
Lazarov, L. (2018). Education in the 21st century- pedagogical approaches in digital environment. E-teacher information system, Eastern Academic Journal, issue 2, 13-25. Article-18-2-2.pdf
Levin, B. & Fullan, M. (2008). Learning about system renewal. Journal of Educational Management, Administration and Leadership, 36(2), 289-303. https://doi.org/10.1177/174114320708778
Li, Y. & Lu, X. (2018). Constant self –initiated teacher change, factors and mechanisms: A narrative inquiry. Cogent Education 6(1)
Livingston, K. (2012). Independent learning In: Seel, N. M. (eds) Encyclopaedia of sciences of Learning, Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1428-6
Maaji, A. S. (2008). Evaluation of Vocational technical training programmes inNothern Nigerian Prisons [ Unpublished Ph.D Dissertation. Department of vocational teacher education. University of Nigeria, Nsukka]. http://oer.unn.edu.ng/read
Mascolo, M. (2009). Beyond student centered and teacher-centered pedagogy: Teaching and learning as a guided participation. Pedagogy and the Human sciences, 1(1), 3-27.
Mutch, C. (2012). Curriculum change and teacher resistance. www.researchgate.net/publication/298564397
Mwangi, T. J., & Kibui, W. A. (2017). Effect of chemistry practicals on students’performance in chemistry in public secondary schools in Machakos and Nairobi Counties in Kenya. International Journal of Science and Research, 6(8) , ART201758884.pdf
Ndirangu, C. W. (2013). Factors influencing teachers’ level of implementation of SMASSE innovation in Nyeri County, Kenya [ Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Nairobi]. University of Nairobi Repository, http://hdl.handle.net/11295/63524
Ndirangu, M., Kathuri, B, C., & Mungai, B. (2003). Improvisation as a strategy for providing science teaching resources: An experience from Kenya. International Journal of Educational Development,
Nundy, S., Dillon, J. and Dowd, (2009). Improvising and encouraging teacher confidence in out-of classroom learning: the impact of Hampshire Trailblazer project on 3-13 curriculum practitioners. Interdisplinery Journal of primary, Elementary and early Years Education, 37(1). 61-73. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004270802291889
OECD (n.d.). Teachers’ pedagogical knowledge and the teaching profession: background report and project objectives.background_document_to_symposium_ITEL_FINAL.pdf.
OECD. (2005). Teachers matter: Attracting, developing and Retaining Effective Teachers. OECD.
OECD. (2018). Understanding innovative pedagogies: Key themes to analyze new approaches to teaching and learning . OECD Education Working paper No 172. www.oecd.org/edu/working papers
Ogunkola, T. B. (2000). The relationship between cognitive entry behavior. Performance of some Nigerian secondary school students.IFE Psychology lA ,8.
Oloruntegbe, K. O. (2011). Teacehrs’ involvement, commitment and innovativeness in curriculum development and implementation. Journal of Emerging Trends in Educational Research and Policy Studies 2(6).
Orafi, M. S. (2008). Investigating teachers’ practices and beliefs in relation to curriculum innovation in English language teaching in Libya. unpublished Ph. D thesis, University of leads.
Orit, A., U. & Eshet, Y. A. (2011).Teachers in a world of change: Teachers' knowledge and attitudes towards the implementation of innovative
technologies in school. Inter-disciplinary Journal of E-learningwa, 7. http://doi/10.28945/1525
Randall, M. M., & Cox, A. J. (2015). Learner-centered pedagogy: Considerations for application in a didactic course. The professional counselor, 5(3), 379-389. https://doi.10.15241/mm.5.3.379
Reeves, D. B. (2004). Accountability for learning: How teachers and school leaders can take
charge. Alexandria , VA: Association for supervision and curriculum Development.
Rocane, M. (n. d.). The significance of teachers’ beliefs in the learning process. 29afa53fb66dac58a6e482bfe99ce38397d2.pdf
Rydaer, J, Banner, I (2012), school teachers experience of science curriculum reform. International Journal of science Education 35(3), 490-513. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2012.665195
Sagiman, M. D. S., & Herawan, T. (2018).Assessing teacher competence and its follow-up to support professional development sustain ability. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability 20(1), 106-123. https/doi.10.2478/ites-2018-0007
Schovid, R. (2018). Pockets of excellence: teacher beliefs and behaviors that lead to high school achievement at low achieving schools. Sage Open, 8(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244018797238
Serdyukov, P. (2017). Innovation in education: What works, what doesn’t and what to do about it? Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching and Learning. https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/JRIT-10-2016-0007/full/html https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/JRIT-10-2016-0007-ful-html
Simiyu, C. P. (2015). Influence of institutional and learners’ characteristics on students’ academic achievement [Unpublished Ph.D Thesis, University of Nairobi]. University of Nairobi Repository, http://hdl.handle.net/11295/90359
SMASSE INSET, (2010). Secondary school situational analysison supervision of ASEI-PDSI at school level in Kenya [Paper presentation] Kenya Science Teachers College.
TALIS. (2013). Teacher questionnaire TALIS-2013-England-Teacher-Questionnaire.pdf
TALIS. (2018). Conceptual framework. https.//dx.doi.org/10.1787/799337C-2-en.
Tschannen-Moran, M, A. (2009). Sources of self- efficacy : four professional development formats and their relationship to self-efficacy and implementation of a new teaching strategy. E
Copyright (c) 2021 International Journal of Curriculum and Instruction
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Submission of an article implies that the work described has not been published previously (except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture or academic thesis), that it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere, that its publication is approved by all authors and tacitly or explicitly by the responsible authorities where the work was carried out, and that, if accepted, will not be published elsewhere in the same form, in English or in any other language, without the written consent of the Publisher. The Editors reserve the right to edit or otherwise alter all contributions, but authors will receive proofs for approval before publication.
Copyrights for articles published in International Journal of Curriculum and Instruction are retained by the authors, with first publication rights granted to the journal. The journal/publisher is not responsible for subsequent uses of the work. It is the author's responsibility to bring an infringement action if so desired by the author.