What Do Teachers Think About Finger-Counting?
AbstractThe aim of this study is to determine preschool, special education, classroom and mathematics teachers’ views of finger-counting in mathematics teaching. The study was conducted with case study design. The sample of the study consisted of 34 teachers. Data were collected using an 8-item written form, and content analysis was performed. The findings of the study indicate that most participants use fingers as manipulatives in the teaching of numbers and counting but use them very little when teaching the four operations. Most participants state that finger-counting should be used at ages 4-8 / 4-11 while some state that there should not be any age limit. According to the participants, the advantages of finger-counting are that it is practical and accessible, facilitates retention and internalization, and makes the arithmetic more concrete while its disadvantages are that it restricts and slows down the execution of the four operations, prevents the development of mental arithmetic skills and turns into a habit. They state that students who insist on finger-counting have high anxiety, poor memory, and low self-confidence and achievement. Some participants encourage their students to perform mathematical calculations without using pen and paper to help them break the habit of finger-counting and also receive parental support during the process. The fact that students have different characteristics should be taken into account when addressing the use of finger-counting in mathematics teaching because the use of fingers in counting and calculation may be a necessity rather than a choice for some students.
Albayrak, M. (2010). An experimental study on preventing first graders from finger counting in basic calculations. In Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology 8 (3), 1131–1150.
Alibali, M. W., & Nathan, M. J. (2012). Embodiment in mathematics teaching and learning: evidence from learners' and teachers' gestures. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 21(2), 247-286.
Andres, M., Seron, X., & Olivier, E. (2007). Contribution of hand motor circuits to counting. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19(4), 563–576.
Bender, A. & Beller, S. (2011). Fingers as a tool for counting - naturally fixed or culturally flexible? In Frontiers in psychology, 2, 256. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00256.
Bender, A. & Beller, S. (2012).Nature and culture of finger counting: Diversity and representational effects of an embodied cognitive tool. Cognition, 124 (2), 156-182.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2012.05.005.
Butterworth, B. (1999). What Counts: How the Brain is Hardwired for Math. New York: The Free Press.
Chinello, F., Pacchierotti, C., Tsagarakis, N. G., & Prattichizzo, D. (2016). Design of a wearable skin stretch cutaneous device for the upper limb, in Proceedings of the IEEE Haptics Symposium, (Philadelphia, PA: IEEE Xplore), 14–20. doi:10.1109/HAPTICS.2016.7463149
Conant, L.L. (1896). The Number Concept.--Its Origin and Development. London: Macmillan & Co.
Creswell, John W. (2014). Research Design. Qualitataive, Quantiative and Mixed Methods Approaches. Fourth ed. Lincoln: Sage Publications
Dantzig, T. (2005). Number The Language of Science. Edited by Joseph Mazur. New York: Pi Press
Fuson, K.C. (1988). Children’s counting and concepts of number. New York: Springer.
Gracia-Bafalluy, M., & Noel, M. P. (2008). Does finger training increase young children's numerical performance?. Cortex, 44(4), 368-375.
Glenberg, A. M., Gutierrez, T., Levin, J.R., Japuntich, S., & Kaschak, M. P. (2004). Activity and Imagined Activity Can Enhance Young Children's Reading Comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(3), 424-436.DOI: 10.1037/0022-06126.96.36.1994
Guha, S. (2006). Using mathematics strategies in early childhood education as a basis for culturally responsive teaching in India. International Journal of Early Years Education, 14(1), 15-34, DOI: 10.1080/09669760500446374
Ifrah, G. (2012). Rakamların Evrensel Tarihi. K.Dinçer (çev), Alfa Basım Yayım Dağıtım:İstanbul.
Jordan, N., Hanich, L. B., & Uberti, H. Z. (2003). Mathematical thinking and learning difficulties. In A. J. Baroody & A. Dowker (eds.), Development of arithmetic concepts and skills (pp. 361-384). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
Kaufmann, L., Vogel, S., Wood, G., Kremser, C., Schocke, M., Zimmerhackl, L.B., & Koten, JW (2008). A developmental fMRI study of non-symbolic numerical and spatial processing. Cortex, 44, 376–85.
Lindemann, O., Alipour, A., & Fischer, M. H. (2011). Finger counting habits in middle eastern and western individuals: an online survey. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 42(4), 566-578.
Merriam, S.B. (2013). Qualitative Research: Nitel Araştırma (Çev. Ed.: Selahattin Turan). Ankara:Nobel Yayıncılık.
Miles, M.B., Huberman, A.M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Moeller, K., Martignon, L., Wessolowski, S., Engel, J., & Nuerk, H. C. (2011). Effects of finger counting on numerical development the opposing views of neurocognition and mathematics education. Frontiers in Psychology, 2(November), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00328
Mink, D. V. (2010). Strategies for teaching mathematics. Shell education: Huntington Beach.
Mutlu, Y., & Soylu, F. (2018). Eğitsel sinirbilim ve bedenlenmiş biliş perspektifinden matematik öğrenme güçlüğü yaşayan öğrencilerde parmakla sayma. Adem İşcan (ed). Eğitim Bilimlerinde Örnek Araştırmalar. Ankara: Nobel.
Mutlu, Y. (2018). Matematik Öğrenme Güçlüğü Bağlamında Parmakla Sayma. Paper presented at the 1st International Congress on New Horizons in Education and Social Sciences (ICES-2018), İstanbul, Turkey.
Newman, S. (2016). Does finger sense predict addition performance? Cognitive Processing, 17, 139–146. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-016-0756-7
Noel, M. P. (2005). Finger gnosia: a predictor of numerical abilities in children? Child Neuropsychology, 11, 413–430.
Penner-Wilger, M., & Anderson, M. L. (2013). The relation between finger gnosis and mathematical ability: why redeployment of neural circuits best explains the finding. Frontiers in Psychology, 4(December), 877. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00877
Piazza, C.C., Patel, M.R., Santana, C.M., Goh, H, Delia M & Lancaster, B.M. (2002). An evaluation of simultaneous sequential presentation of preferred and non-preferred food to treat food selectivity. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis. 35:259–270. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
Stegemann, K.C. & Grünke, M. (2014). Revisiting an old methodology for teaching counting, computation, and place value: the effectiveness of the finger calculation method for at-risk children. Learning Disabilities: A Contemporary Journal, 12(2), 191-213.
Sternberg, R. J., & Grigorenko, E. L. (2004). Successful intelligence in the classroom. Theory into Practice, 43, 274-280. doi:10.1207/s15430421tip4304_5.
Yalvaç, B., Soylu, F., & Arıkan, A. (2011). Bedenlenmiş biliş ve eğitim. Ethos: Felsefe ve Toplumsal Bilimlerde Diyaloglar, 4(1), 1-20.
Wasner, M., Moeller, K., Fischer, M.H., & Nuerk, H.C. (2015): Related but not the same. Ordinality, cardinality and 1-to-1 correspondence in finger-based numerical representations. In Journal of Cognitive Psychology 27 (4), pp. 426–441. DOI: 10.1080/20445911.2014.964719.
Submission of an article implies that the work described has not been published previously (except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture or academic thesis), that it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere, that its publication is approved by all authors and tacitly or explicitly by the responsible authorities where the work was carried out, and that, if accepted, will not be published elsewhere in the same form, in English or in any other language, without the written consent of the Publisher. The Editors reserve the right to edit or otherwise alter all contributions, but authors will receive proofs for approval before publication.
Copyrights for articles published in International Journal of Curriculum and Instruction are retained by the authors, with first publication rights granted to the journal. The journal/publisher is not responsible for subsequent uses of the work. It is the author's responsibility to bring an infringement action if so desired by the author.