Qualitative study on EFL teachers’ self-perceived beliefs about teacher autonomy
AbstractTeacher autonomy has been debated for a long time as a term and for its possible functions. It is a multi-faceted term which has lots of definitions in the literature. And more studies have been conducted to investigate it but there is still a need for in-depth analysis of the term and its dimensions. The purpose of this study is to explore EFL teachers’ self-perceived beliefs about teacher autonomy. The present study seeks out the answers to what EFL teachers know about teacher autonomy, how they define it, whether they have had any practices in their teaching career so far or not regarding teacher autonomy and what assumptions are underlying behind their self-reported practices. The participants of this study were EFL teachers (12 female and 2 male) who work in different contexts. The data was collected through written interviews/self-reports and primary data was further discussed in a focus group interview. The findings of the study reveal that all the participant teachers have an idea about teacher autonomy. While most of the teachers have a broader perspective about the issue, a few of them have some views about the term even if they don’t perceive themselves as a fully autonomous teacher. It also shows that most of the participant teachers are aware of the importance of teacher autonomy. Key Words: Teacher perceptions, teacher beliefs, teacher autonomy, ELT, EFL
Benard, B. (1995). Fostering resilience in children. Urbana, IL: ERIC
Clearinghouse on Elementary and Childhood Education. (ERIC
Document Reproduction Service No.ED386327)
Blase, J., & Kirby, P. C. (2009). Bringing out the best in teachers: What
effective principals do. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Bogler, R. (2001). The influence of leadership style on teacher job
satisfaction. Educational Administration Quarterly, 37, 662-683.
Borg, M. (2001) “Key concepts in ELT”, in Teacher’s Beliefs, 55, 2: 186-
Borg, S. (2003). Teacher cognition in language teaching: A review of
research on what language teachers think, know, believe, and do.
Language teaching, 38, 81-109.
Brunetti, G. J. (2001). Why do they teach? A study of job satisfaction
among long-term high school teachers. Teacher Education Quarterly,
Burn, R. B. (1997) Introduction of research methods, (3rd Ed.).
Crawford, J. R. (2001). Teacher autonomy and accountability in charter
schools. Education and Urban Society, 33, 186-200.
Frase, L. E. and Sorenson, L. (1992). Teacher motivation and satisfaction:
Impact on participatory management. NASSP Bulletin (January
Ghaith, G., & Yahgi, H. (1997). Relationships among experience, teacher
efficacy, and attitudes toward the implementation of instructional
innovation. Teaching & Teacher Education, 13, 451-458.
Guarino, C. M., Santibanez, L., & Daley, G. A. (2006). Teacher recruitment
and retention: A review of recent empirical literature. Review of
Educational Research, 76, 173-208.
Hedge, Hardy, M. and Heyes, S. (1979). Beginning Psychology: A
comprehensive Introduction to Psychology (4th edition). Oxford:
Oxford University Press.
Horng, E. L. (2009). Teacher tradeoffs: Disentangling teachers'
preferences for working conditions and student demographics.
Administrative Educational Research Journal, 46, 690-717.
Ingersoll, R. M. (1994). Teacher control in secondary schools. Harvard
Educational Review, 64,150-169.
Ingersoll, R. M. (1996). Teachers' decision-making power and school
conflict. Sociology of Education, 69, 159-176.
Johnson, S. M., & Birkeland, S. E. (2001). Pursuing a "sense of success":
New teachers explain their career decisions. American Educational
Research Journal, 38, 581-617
LaCoe, C. S. (2006). Decomposing teacher autonomy: A study
investigating types of teacher autonomy and how current public
school climate affects teacher autonomy. Dissertation Abstracts
International, 63(11), 798A. (UMI No. 3209987)
Little, D. (1995). Learning as dialogue: The dependence of learner
autonomy on teacher autonomy. System 23.2: 175– 182.
Lortie, D. C. (1969). The balance and control and autonomy in
elementary school teaching. Chicago: University of Chicago,
Department of Education.
Mansour, N. (2009). Science Teachers’ Beliefs and Practices: Issues,
Implications and Research Agenda. International Journal of
Environmental & Science Education, 4(1), 25-48.
O'Hara, D. P. (2006). Teacher autonomy: Why do teachers want it, and
how do principals determine who deserves it? Dissertation Abstracts
International, 67(07), p. 2413A. (UMI No. 3227718)
Pajares, M. F., (1992). Teachers’ beliefs and educational research:
Cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research, 62
Pearson, L. C. (1995). Prediction of teacher autonomy from set of work-
related variables. Journal of Research and Development in Education,
Pearson, L. C., Hall, B. W. (1993). Initial construct validation of the
eaching autonomy scale. Journal of Educational Research, 86(3),
Richards, J. C., Pennington, M., (1998). The first year of teaching. In J. C.
Richards, ed. Beyond Training. Cambridge University Press, 173-190.
Rudolph, L. (2006). Decomposing teacher autonomy: A study
investigating types of teacher autonomy and how it relates to job
satisfaction. Dissertation Abstracts International,67(03), p. 804A.
(UMI No. 320991
Sentovich, C. (2004). Teacher satisfaction in public, private, and charter
schools: A multi-level analysis. Dissertation Abstracts International,
(07), 2449A. (UMI No. 3140225)
Stockard, J., & Lehman, M. B. (2004). Influences on the satisfaction and
retention of first year teachers: The importance of effective school
management. Educational Administration Quarterly, 40, 742-771.
Street, M. S. (1988). An investigation of the relationships among
supervisory expertise of the principal, teacher autonomy, and
environmental robustness of the school. (Doctoral dissertation, Louisiana State University, 1988). Dissertations Abstracts International,
Smith, R.C. (2003). Teacher education for teacher-learner autonomy. In J.
Ferguson & H. Trappes-Lomax (eds), Symposium for Language
TeacherEducators: Papers from Three IALSSymposia (CD-ROM).
Edinburgh: IALS, University of Edinburgh.
Smyth, J. (1989). Developing and sustaining critical reflection in teacher
education. Journal of Teacher Education 40 (2): 2-9.
Shor, I. & Freire, P. (1987). A pedagogy for liberation: dialogues on
transforming education. South Hadley,New York: Bergin & Garvey.
Submission of an article implies that the work described has not been published previously (except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture or academic thesis), that it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere, that its publication is approved by all authors and tacitly or explicitly by the responsible authorities where the work was carried out, and that, if accepted, will not be published elsewhere in the same form, in English or in any other language, without the written consent of the Publisher. The Editors reserve the right to edit or otherwise alter all contributions, but authors will receive proofs for approval before publication.
Copyrights for articles published in International Journal of Curriculum and Instruction are retained by the authors, with first publication rights granted to the journal. The journal/publisher is not responsible for subsequent uses of the work. It is the author's responsibility to bring an infringement action if so desired by the author.