The Metaphors of Turkish, Bulgarian and Romanian Students on STEM Disciplines
AbstractThis study was conducted with both Bulgarian and Turkish eight-grade students, who studied in two different middle schools. It was aimed to understand Bulgarian, Romanian and Turkish students’ metaphors on STEM disciplines. 18 Bulgarian, 23 Romanian and 20 Turkish students voluntarily participated in this study. Within this context, four separate statements were given to the students to be filled with their metaphors. The statement was like “Science looks like ..., because ... .” It is inferred from the results that Bulgarian, Romanian and Turkish students’ metaphors are different from each other.
Aykaç, N. & Özkan, Ç. (2014). Comparison of Methaphoric Perception of Teachers and Pre-service Teachers About Curriculum. Education and Science,39(73), 326-339.
Çalışıcı, H. & Sümen, Ö. Ö. (2018). Metaphorical Perceptions of Prospective Teachers for STEM Education. Universal Journal of Educational Research 6(5), 871-880.
Goodnough, K & Murphy, E. (2017). An analysis of the professional learning of science teachers using the metaphor of learning by expanding. Issues in Educational Research, 27(1), 64-81.
Hansen, J. & Richland, L.E., Baumer, E. P. & Tomlinson, W. (2012). Metaphor And Creatıvıty In Learnıng Scıence. Metaphor and Creativity in Learning Science.
İdin, Ş. (2017). Örnek ve Uygulama Destekli Fen Öğretiminde Disiplinlerarası Beceri Etkileşimi (Edt. Ersin Karademir). 7. Bölüm: STEM Yaklaşımı ve Eğitime Yansımaları, 257-288. Pegem Akademi Yayınları.
İdin, S. & Dönmez, İ. (2018). A metaphor analysis study related to STEM subjects based on middle school students’ perceptions. Journal of Education in Science, Environment and Health (JESEH), 4(2), 246-257. DOI:10.21891/jeseh.453629
Cannady, M.A., Greenwald. E. & Harrisi, K. N. (2014). Problematizing the STEM Pipeline Metaphor: Is the STEM Pipeline Metaphor Serving Our Students and the STEM Workforce? Science Education, 98(3), 443-460.
Lancor, R. (2015) An Analysis of Metaphors Used by Students to Describe Energy in an Interdisciplinary General Science Course. International Journal of Science Education, 37(5-6), 876-902. DOI: 10.1080/09500693.2015.1025309
Lin, W. C., Shein, P. P. & Yang, S. C. (2012). Exploring personal EFL teaching metaphors in pre-service teacher education. English Teaching: Practice and Critique, 11(1), 183-199.
Miles, M. B. & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd Ed.). Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications.
Niebert, K., Marsch, S. & Treagust, D.F. (2012). Understanding Needs Embodiment: A Theory-Guided Reanalysis of the Role of Metaphors and Analogies in Understanding Science. Science Education, 96(5), 849-877.
OECD, (2012). PISA 2012. PISA results in focus. Retrieved from: https://www.oecd.org/pisa/keyfindings/pisa-2012-results-overview.pdf
OECD, (2016). PISA 2015. PISA results in focus. Retrieved from: https://www.oecd.org/pisa/pisa-2015-results in-focus.pdf.
Pawley, A. L. & Hoegh, J. (2011). Ac 2011-2091: Exploding Pipelines: Mythological Metaphors Structurıng Diversity-Oriented Engineering Education. American Society for Engineering Education,
Taylor, N. K & Haydon, A. (2016). Using metaphor to translate the science of resilience and developmental outcomes. Public Understanding of Science, 25(5), 576-587.
Taylor, C. & Dewsbury, B. M. 82018). On the Problem and Promise of Metaphor Use in Science and Science Communication. Journal Of Mıcrobıology & Bıology Educatıon, 19(1), 1-5.
TIMSS (2015). TIMSS 2015 International Results in Science: Student Achievement Overview. Retrieved from: http://timss2015.org/timss-2015/science/student-achievement/
TIMSS (2015). TIMSS 2015 International Results In Mathematics. Retrieved from: http://timss2015.org/timss-2015/mathematics/student-achievement/
TÜSİAD (2016). Industry 4.0 in Turkey as an imperative for global competitiveness an emerging market perspective. Retrieved from: http://tusiad.org/en/reports/item/9011-industry-40-in-turkey-as-an- imperative-for-global-competitiveness
Submission of an article implies that the work described has not been published previously (except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture or academic thesis), that it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere, that its publication is approved by all authors and tacitly or explicitly by the responsible authorities where the work was carried out, and that, if accepted, will not be published elsewhere in the same form, in English or in any other language, without the written consent of the Publisher. The Editors reserve the right to edit or otherwise alter all contributions, but authors will receive proofs for approval before publication.
Copyrights for articles published in International Journal of Curriculum and Instruction are retained by the authors, with first publication rights granted to the journal. The journal/publisher is not responsible for subsequent uses of the work. It is the author's responsibility to bring an infringement action if so desired by the author.