Possible Problems in Online Foreign Language Teaching at a University Context
AbstractOnline language teaching and learning contexts yield both merits and drawbacks for professionals and learners. Within this scope, this study investigated the views of instructors on possible problems of online foreign language teaching with regard to language skills, language areas, and classroom management. A questionnaire consisting of 19 items was developed and implemented by the researcher. The study involved 30 language instructors selected purposefully at a state university context in Turkey, and they took part in the process voluntarily. They had varying educational backgrounds and teaching experiences. Frequencies (f) and percentages (%) were used in analyzing the data. The results were reported descriptively at the end. The results demonstrated that the participants supported online foreign language teaching with regard to language skills and language areas while they considered some aspects problematic in relation to classroom management. Finally, limitations of the inquiry and implications for future studies were discussed based on the results.
Allen, E., & Seaman, J. (2010). Class differences: Online education in the United States. Babson Survey Research Group Report. The Sloan Consortium. Retrieved from: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED529952.pdf.
Anderson, T. (2008). Theory and practice of online learning. Edmonton: Athabasca University Press.
Axtell, C. M., Fleck, S. J., & Turner, N. (2004). Virtual teams: Collaborating across distance. In C. L. Cooper & I. T. Robertson (Eds.), International review of industrial and organizational psychology Vol 19, 205–248. Chichester: Wiley&Sons.
Bax, S. (2003). CALL—past, present and future. System, 31, 13–28.
Coffin, R. J., & Macintyre, P. (1999). Motivational influences on computer-related affective states. Computers in Human Behavior 15, 549-569.
Chacón-Beltrán, R. (2014). Massive online open courses and language learning: The case for a beginners' English course. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 141, 242 – 246.
Cunningham, D. (1998). 25 years of technology in language teaching: A personal experience. Babel: Journal of the Australian Federation of Modern Language Teacher/Associations, 33(1), 4-7.
Felix, U. (2003). An orchestrated vision of language learning online. In Felix, U. (Eds), Language learning online. Towards best practice. Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger.
Hampel, R., & Stickler, U. (2005). New skills for new classrooms: Training tutors to teach languages online. Computer Assisted Language Learning 18(4), 311 – 326.
Harrison, R., & Thomas, M. (2009). Identity in online communities: Social networking sites and language learning. International Journal of Emerging Technologies & Society 7(2), 109 – 124.
Hou, H. (2015). What makes an online community of practice work? A situated study of Chinese student teachers’ perceptions of online professional learning. Teaching and Teacher Education 46, 6-16.
Hyland, K. (1993). ESL computer writers: What can we do to help? System, 21(1), 21-29.
Iandoli, L. J. (1990). CALL and the profession: The current state. French Review, 64(2), 261-272.
Jolliffe, A., Ritter, J., & Stevens, D. (2001). The online learning handbook: Developing and using web-based learning. UK: Kogan Page Limited.
Juhary, J. (2012). Online comments for language learning: A pilot study. Procedia Technology 1, 297-302.
Liu, M., Moore, Z., Graham, L., & Lee, S. (2002). A Look at the research on computer-based technology use in second language learning. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 34(3), 250-273.
Meskill, C., & Anthony, N. (2014). Managing synchronous polyfocality in new media/new learning: Online language educators’ instructional strategies. System 42, 177–188.
Peñarroja, V., Orengo, V., Zornoza, A., & Hernández, A. (2013). The effects of virtuality level on task-related collaborative behaviors: The mediating role of team trust. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(3), 967–974.
Rogerson-Revell, P. (2007). Directions in e-learning tools and technologies and their relevance to online distance language education. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 22(1), 57-74.
Ritter, M. (1993). "That's us! A book about ourselves" An EFL project with intermediate learners, incorporating the computer as a tool. CALICO Journal,10(4), 57-69.
Russell, V., & Curtis, W. (2013). Comparing a large- and small-scale online language course: An examination of teacher and learner perceptions. Internet and Higher Education 16, 1–13.
Shaw, R. S. (2013). The relationships among group size, participation, and performance of programming language learning supported with online forums. Computers & Education 62,196–207.
Sung, D., & Yeh, C. Y. (2012). Perceptions of using online technology in language education: An interview study with Taiwanese university students. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 51, 405–410.
Tanyeli, N. (2009). The efficiency of online English language instruction on students’ reading skills. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences 1, 564–567.
Tomasello, M., Carpenter, M., & Liszkowski, U. (2007). A new look at infant pointing. Journal of Child Development, 78(3), 705–722.
Tsai, M. J., & Tsai, C. C. (2003). Information searching strategies in web-based science learning: The role of internet self-efficacy. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 40(1), 43-50.
Ushida, E. (2005). The role of studentsʼ attitudes and motivation in second language learning in online language courses. CALICO Journal, 23(1), 49-78.
Yang, Y., & Lin, N. C. (2010). Internet perceptions, online participation and language learning in Moodle forums: A case study on nursing students in Taiwan. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences 2, 2647–2651.
Yang, S. C., & Chen, Y. J. (2007). Technology-enhanced language learning: A case study. Computers in Human Behavior 23, 860–879.
Zamari, Z. M., Adnan, A. H. M., Idris, S. L., & Yusof, J. (2012). Students’ perception of using online language learning materials. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 67, 611 – 620.
Submission of an article implies that the work described has not been published previously (except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture or academic thesis), that it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere, that its publication is approved by all authors and tacitly or explicitly by the responsible authorities where the work was carried out, and that, if accepted, will not be published elsewhere in the same form, in English or in any other language, without the written consent of the Publisher. The Editors reserve the right to edit or otherwise alter all contributions, but authors will receive proofs for approval before publication.
Copyrights for articles published in International Journal of Curriculum and Instruction are retained by the authors, with first publication rights granted to the journal. The journal/publisher is not responsible for subsequent uses of the work. It is the author's responsibility to bring an infringement action if so desired by the author.