Factors Affecting Students’ English Proficiency in a Turkish EMI University: A Phenomenological Study

Bahar Hasirci, Gulcin Cosgun

Abstract


This paper reports on an investigation of Turkish English-medium university students’ perceptions of the change in their language ability and the factors affecting this change. Results revealed that 1) when students are highly exposed to English and are expected to use it productively for their studies, they perceive that there is greater development in their language skills and abilities 2) students think that corrective feedback plays a crucial role in helping them focus their attention on the form 3) speaking is perceived to be the weakest and the least improved skill over the years. These findings suggest insightful implications for English-medium universities in Turkey and all around the world.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Appel, G. & Lantolf, J, P. (1994). Speaking as mediation: L1 and L2 Text recall tasks. Modern Language Journal, 78(4) 437-452.

Başıbek, N., Dolmacı, M., Cengiz, B.C., Bür, B., Dilek,Y. & Kara, B. (2014). Lecturers’ perceptions of English medium instruction at engineering departments of higher education: A study on partial English medium instruction at some state universities in Turkey: Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 1819 –1825.

Byun, K. Y., Chu, H.J., Kim, M.J., Park, I.W., Kim, S.H., & Jung, J. Y. (2011). English-medium teaching in Korean higher education: Policy debates and reality. Higher Education, 62, 431–449.

Cho, D. W. (2012). English-medium instruction in the university context of Korea: Tradeoff between teaching outcomes and media-initiated university ranking. The Journal of Asia TEFL, 9(4), 135-163.

Coleman, J. A. (2006). English-medium teaching in European higher education. Language Teaching, 39(1), 1–14.

Collins, B. A. (2010). English-Medium higher education: Dilemma and problems. Egitim Arastirmalari-Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 39, 97-110.

Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.

Dearden, J. (2014). English as a medium of instruction-A growing global phenomenon. London: British Council Available online at http://goo.gl/2kKaKw

Donato, R & McCormick, D. (1994). A sociocultural perspective on language learning strategies: The role of mediation. Modern Language Journal, 78 (4), 453-464.

Ellis, R. (1994). The study of second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Fraenkel, J. Wallen, N., & Hyun, H. (2015). How to design and evaluate research in education- 8th Edition. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Education

Hatch, J. A. (2002). Doing qualitative research in education settings. Albany: State University of New York Press.

Hatch, J. A., & Wisniewski, R. (1995). Life history and narrative: Questions, issues, and exemplary works. In J. A. Hatch & R. Wisniewski (Eds.), Life history and narrative (pp. 113–136). London: Falmer.

Hellekjaer, G.O. & Westergaard, M. (2003). An exploratory survey of content learning through English at Nordic Universities. In Ch. Van Leeuwen & R. Wilkinson (Eds.), Multilingual approaches in university education: Challenges and practices (pp. 65-81). Uitgeverij valkhof Pers Nijmegen

Hennebry, M., Lo, Y. Y. & Macaro, E. (2012) Differing perspectives of non-native speaker students’ linguistic experiences on higher degree courses. Oxford Review of Education, 38(2), 209-230

Huang, F. (2006). Internationalization of curricula in higher education institutions in comparative perspectives: Case studies of China, Japan and the Netherlands. Higher Education, 51, 521-539.

Kachru, B. (1990). The alchemy of English: The spread, functions, and models non-native Englishes. Champaign, IL: University of Illinois Press.

Kim, E. (2002). Voices of learners from English-medium lecture. Korean Journal of Applied Linguistics, 18(2), 145–163.

Kim, J., Tatar, B. & Choi, J. (2014). Emerging culture of English-medium instruction in Korea: experiences of Korean and international students. Language and Intercultural Communication, 14(4), 441-459.

Kim, E. G., Kweon, S. & Kim, J. (2016). Korean engineering students’ perceptions of English-medium instruction (EMI) and L1 use in EMI classes. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 38(2), 130-145. http://doi.org/cdwv

Kırkgoz, Y. (2009). Students’ and lecturers’ perceptions of the effectiveness of foreign language instruction in an English-medium university in Turkey: Teaching in Higher Education, 14(1), 81-93.

Klaassen, R. G., & Graaff, E. (2001). Facing innovation: Preparing lectures for English-medium instruction in a non-native context. European Journal of Engineering Education, 26(3), 281–289.

Krashen, S. (1985). The Input Hypothesis. London: Longman.

Krashen, S. D. (1987). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. New York, NY: Prentice-Hall International.

Kruseman, A. N. (2003). Preface. In Van Leeuwen & Wilkinson (eds.), 7–10, English-medium teaching in Korean higher education: policy debates and reality.

Lee, G. J. (2014). Why students don’t participate in English medium instruction classes in a Korean university: A case study. English Teaching, 69(1), 91-117.

Lightbrown, P., & Spada, N. M. (2006). How languages are learned. England: OUP.

Long, M. H. (1981). Input, interaction, and second language acquisition. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 379, 259-278.

Long, M. H. (1996). The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In W. C. Ritchie & T. K. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 413–468). New York: Academic Press

Mackey, A. (1999). Input, interaction and second language development: An Empirical study of question formation in ESL. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21(04), 557 – 587.

McNabb, D.E. (2002). Research Methods in Public Administration and Nonprofit Management: Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe

Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. New York: Jossey-Bass

Miles, M. B. & Huberman, A. M. (1994). An expanded sourcebook. Qualitative data analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publication.

Mitchell, R. & Myles, F. (2004). Second language learning theories. London: Hodder Arnold.

Montgomery, S. (2004). Of towers, walls, and fields: Perspectives on language in science. Science, 303(5662), 1333–1335.

Olsen, L. A., & Huckin, T. H. (1990). Point-driven understanding in engineering lecture comprehension. English for Specific Purpose, 9(1), 33–47.

Rogier, D. (2012). The effects of English-medium instruction on language proficiency of students enrolled in higher education in the UAE. Unpublished Dissertation: The University of Exeter.

Saldana, J. (2011). Fundamentals of qualitative research: Understanding qualitative research. New York: Oxford University Press

Schmidt, R. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11, 129-158.

Seidman, I. (2006). Interviewing as qualitative research: A Guide for researchers in education and the social sciences. New York: Teachers College Press.

Storch, N. (2009). The impact of studying in a second language (L2) medium university on the development of L2 writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 18, 103–118.

Vygotsky, L.S. (1997). Educational psychology. Boca Raton, FL: St. Lucie Press.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


  Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

 

Copyright © 1986 - 2017 by World Council for Curriculum and Instruction (WCCI)
ISSN 1562-0506