Students’ perception of alternative assessment: A qualitative meta-analysis
AbstractMany studies have been conducted on the implementation of alternative assessments on students. However, this study is carried out to explore definitions, characteristics and students’ perceptions of alternative assessment at university and school level. A total of one hundred and seventeen (117) journal articles were searched through different search engines, and only twenty-six (24) recent and relevant publications published between years 2002 to 2018 were included in this study and remaining are excluded. Among inclusions, there were ten (10) quantitative researches, six (6) qualitative, seven (7) mix-mode and one (1) review paper. The overall respondents of the studies were two thousand eight hundred and seven (2807). Most of the studies were carried in Asian countries such as Indonesia, Iran, Turkey, Malaysia, Bosnia, Thailand and Egypt and some of the studies were conducted in the USA, UK, Scotland, and Netherlands. The finding reveals that the learners have a positive perception of implementing the alternative assessment. Furthermore, the findings of some studies revealed alternative assessment is preferable while other researches indicated the alternative assessment favorably. Besides, some studies have suggested some recommendations for the implementation of alternative assessment. Keywords: alternative assessments, students’ perceptions, definitions, characteristics
Andrade, H. L. (2019). A critical review of research on student self-assessment. In Frontiers in Education (Vol. 4, p. 87). Frontiers.
Andrade, H., & Du, Y. (2007). Student responses to criteria‐referenced self‐assessment. Assessment & evaluation in higher education, 32(2), 159-181.
Assessment practice and their approaches to learning. Educational Studies, 34(1), 35-44.
Elezovic, S. J. University students ‘attitudes towards alternative assessment in FLT.
Bachelor, R. B. (2015). Alternative Assessments and Student Perceptions in the Foreign Language Classroom.
Barnard Bachelor, R. (2017). Alternative Assessments and Student Perceptions in the World Language Classroom. Online Submission, 6, 30-44.
Byrnes, H. (2002). The role of task and task-based assessment in a content-oriented collegiate foreign language curriculum. Language testing, 19(4), 419-437.
Belle, D. (1995). Traditional Assessment versus Alternative Assessment. Journal of Education.Retrieved from http://eric.ed.gov/
Brawley, N. (2009). Authentic Assessment Vs Traditional Assessment: a
Lui, K, A., & Choy, S., & Cheung, H, Y, Y., & Li, C, S. (2006). A Study on The
Perception of Students towards Educational Weblogs. Informaticin Education. 5(2) 233-254
Cornelius, S., & Kinghorn, O. (2014, March). Student attitudes towards self and peer assessment in Japanese university first year EFL classes. In Foreign Language Education Forum.
Charvade, M. R., Jahandar, S., & Khodabandehlou, M. (2012). The Impact of Portfolio Assessment on EFL Learners' Reading Comprehension Ability. English Language Teaching, 5(7), 129-139
Davis, M. H., Ponnamperuma, G. G., & Ker, J. S. (2009). Student perceptions of a portfolio assessment process. Medical education, 43(1), 89-98. Segers, M., Gijbels, D., & Thurlings, M. (2008). The relationship between students’ perceptions of portfolio
Davis, M. H., Ponnamperuma, G. G., & Ker, J. S. (2009). Student perceptions of a portfolio assessment process. Medical education, 43(1), 89-98.
Du Plessis, L. A., & Koen, I. (2005). Portfolio Assessment of Information Technology Students at a University of Technology: a case study. Education as Change, 9(1), 19-41.
Ghoorchaei, B., Tavakoli, M., & Ansari, D. N. (2010). The impact of portfolio assessment on Iranian EFL students’ essay writing: A process-oriented approach. GEMA Online® Journal of Language Studies, 10(3).
Gholami, H. (2016). Self assessment and learner autonomy. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 6(1), 46-51.
Herman, J. L., Klein, D. C., & Wakai, S. T. (1997). American students’ perspectives on alternative assessment: Do they know it's different?. Assessment in Education: principles, policy & practice, 4(3), 339-352.
Ibberson, H. (2012). An investigation into learners’ and teachers’ attitudes towards learners’ self-assessment according to CEFR scales. Language at the University of Essex, Proceedings, 13-24.
Irawan, M. O. (2017). Students’ Perceptions On Traditional And Alternative Assessment (A Case Study at Department of English Language Education UIN Ar-Raniry) (Doctoral dissertation, UIN Ar-Raniry Banda Aceh).
Kuisma, R. (2007). Portfolio assessment of an undergraduate group project. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 32(5), 557-569.
Kizilkaya, B. Students’ Attitudes Towards Alternative Assessment: A Survey-Based Study on Alternative Assessment.
Krawczyk, R. M. (2017). Effects of Grading on Student Learning and Alternative Assessment Strategies
Mussawy, S. A. J. (2009). Assessment practices: Student’s and teachers’ perceptions of classroom assessment.
Mussawy, J., A., S. (2009). Assessment Practice: Students’ and Teacher’
Perceptions of Classroom Assessment. Master’s Capstone Projects, 1-108. Paper 9. Retrieved from http://scholarworks.umass.edu/
Nasab.G., F. (2015). Alternative Versus Traditional Assessment. Journal of
Applied Linguistics and Language Research. 2(6)165-178. Retrieved from http://www.jallr.ir.
Ningrum, S. D. K. (2016). Students’ Perceptions to Teachers’ Internet Literacy in Information and Communication Technology (ICT) of English Learning Teaching (ELT)(Descriptive-Qualitative in Class VIII SMP Islam Ar Rahmah Suruh in the Academic Year 2018/2019) (Doctoral dissertation, IAIN SALATIGA).
Suwaed, H. EFL Students’ Perceptions of Using Portfolio Assessments in the Writing Classroom: The Case of Libyan Undergraduate Second Year Students
Phongsirikul, M. (2018). Traditional and Alternative Assessments in ELT: Students’ and Teachers’ Perceptions. rEFLections, 25(1), 61-84
Rohmah, S. N., Srijono, D., Srijono, D., & Hum, M. (2018). The Students’ Perception on Self-Assessment in English Language Subject at The Eighth Grade of Junior High School 01 Tawangmangu (Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta).
Sadeghi, K., & Abolfazli Khonbi, Z. (2015). Iranian university students’ experiences of and attitudes towards alternatives in assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 40(5), 641-665.
Siow, L. F. (2018). Students’ Perceptions on Self-and PeerAssessment in Enhancing Learning Experience. MOJES: Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 3(2), 21-35.
Slater, T. F. (1996). Portfolio assessment strategies for grading first-year university physics students in the USA. Physics Education, 31(5), 329.
Sambell, K., Brown, S., & McDowell, L. (1997). " But Is It Fair?": An Exploratory Study of Student Perceptions of the Consequential Validity of Assessment. Studies in educational evaluation, 23(4), 349-71.
Struyven, K., Dochy, F., & Janssens, S. (2005). Students’ perceptions about evaluation and assessment in higher education: A review. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 30(4), 325-341
Copyright (c) 2022 International Journal of Curriculum and Instruction
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Submission of an article implies that the work described has not been published previously (except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture or academic thesis), that it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere, that its publication is approved by all authors and tacitly or explicitly by the responsible authorities where the work was carried out, and that, if accepted, will not be published elsewhere in the same form, in English or in any other language, without the written consent of the Publisher. The Editors reserve the right to edit or otherwise alter all contributions, but authors will receive proofs for approval before publication.
Copyrights for articles published in International Journal of Curriculum and Instruction are retained by the authors, with first publication rights granted to the journal. The journal/publisher is not responsible for subsequent uses of the work. It is the author's responsibility to bring an infringement action if so desired by the author.