A systematic review of concepts in understanding null curriculum
Understanding null curriculum
AbstractAmidst the effort to extend its knowledge base, however, there is still a difficulty in understanding the concept of null curriculum. The general purpose of this paper is to synthesize the fundamental concepts in understanding the nature of null curriculum. Following the research method of systematic review, relevant materials were searched, gathered and analyzed. Results show that themes drawn from the accumulated concepts collectively describe null curriculum as a phenomenon that takes multiple dimensions, occurs at hierarchical levels, and can be identified using different frames of reference. When placed in a broader explanatory perspective, the overlaps in the intellectual processes dimension, the inconsistencies of the implemented and experiential levels, and the unknown scope of universal curriculum draw challenges in fully understanding null curriculum. The conclusions and recommendations are offered in the study.
Anderson, L. W. (2002). Curricular alignment: A re-examination. Theory into Practice, 41(4), 255– 260.
Apple, M.W. (1990). Ideology and curriculum. London: Routledge.
Assemi, A., & Sheikhzade, M. (2013). Intended, implemented and experiential null curriculum. Life Science Journal, 10(1), 82-85.
Beauchamp, G.A. (1982). Curriculum theory: Meaning, development, and use. Theory Into Practice, 21(1), 23-27. doi: 10.1080/00405848209542976
Borek, M. (2012). An analysis of the selection and distribution of knowledge in Massachusetts music teacher preparation programs: The song remains the same. Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts University.
Eisner, E. (1979). The educational imagination: On the design and evaluation of school programs. New York: MacMillan.
Flinders, J., Noddings, N., & Thornton, S. (1986). The null curriculum: Its theoretical basis and practical implications. Curriculum Inquiry, 16(1), 33-42. doi: 10.1080/03626784.1986.11075989
Freire, P. (1974) Education: The practice of freedom. London: Writers Readers Publishing Cooperative.
Gholami, M., Rahimi, A., Ghahramani, O., Dorri, E. (2016). A reflection on null curriculum. Institute of Integrative Omics and Applied Biotechnology Journal, 7(1), 218-223.
Giroux, H.A. (1983). Theory and resistance in education: A pedagogy of the opposition. South Hadley, MA: Bergin and Garvey.
Green S., & Higgins S. (2008). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. England: John Wiley & Sons Ltd
Kian, M. (2016). Analysis of the Null Curriculum of Nutritional literacy among High School Students. Journal of Theory & Practice in Curriculum, 6 (3); 2016, 101-120
Mitchell, B. (2016). Understanding the curriculum. Asian Journal of Humanities and Social Studies, 4(4), 299-311.
Moher D., Liberati A., Tetzlaff J., Altman D.G. (2009). Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. PLoS Medicine, 6(7)
Moore, A. (2015). Understanding the school curriculum: Theory, politics and principles. New York: Routledge
Noddings, N. (2012) The Eisner legacy: A warning unheeded. Journal of Curriculum and
Pedagogy, 9(1), 29-31. doi: 10.1080/15505170.2012.684841
Pellegrino, J. (2006). Rethinking and redesigning curriculum, instruction and assessment. Paper Commissioned by the National Center on Education and the Economy for the New Commission on the Skills of the American Workforce. National Center on Education and the Economy.
Provenzo, E.F., & Provenzo, A.B. (2009). Null curriculum. In Encyclopedia of the Social and Cultural Foundations of Education. California: SAGE.
Seitz, P. (2017). Curriculum alignment among the intended, enacted and assessed curricula for grade 9 mathematics. Journal of the Canadian Association for Curriculum Studies, 15(1), 72-94.
Decker F. Walker (1982) Curriculum theory is many things to many people. Theory into Practice, 21(1), 62-65. doi: 10.1080/00405848209542983
Walsh, P. (1993) Education and meaning: Philosophy in practice. London and New York: Cassell.
Webb, N. L. (1997). Determining alignment of expectations and assessments in mathematics and science education. NISE Brief, 1(2).
Copyright (c) 2021 International Journal of Curriculum and Instruction
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Submission of an article implies that the work described has not been published previously (except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture or academic thesis), that it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere, that its publication is approved by all authors and tacitly or explicitly by the responsible authorities where the work was carried out, and that, if accepted, will not be published elsewhere in the same form, in English or in any other language, without the written consent of the Publisher. The Editors reserve the right to edit or otherwise alter all contributions, but authors will receive proofs for approval before publication.
Copyrights for articles published in International Journal of Curriculum and Instruction are retained by the authors, with first publication rights granted to the journal. The journal/publisher is not responsible for subsequent uses of the work. It is the author's responsibility to bring an infringement action if so desired by the author.