Listening to students’ voices: A participatory approach in improving teaching and learning

Listening to students' voices

Authors

  • Lucena Miranda Department of Education Philippines
  • Ryan Villahermosa
  • Roanne Mendoza
  • Rose Ann Bobadilla
  • Emelinda Javier

Abstract

The role of inclusive research in understanding inclusive education has been globally emphasized in literature. Promoting inclusive education in a newly established senior high school, students in this study were actively involved as co-creators of knowledge with the aim of transforming pedagogies and classrooms. This study employed grounded theory approach (Strauss and Corbin, 1998) in repeatedly examining the data from the actual participation of 85 senior high school students who expressed their voices on the learning experiences that they had in the first two months of school. Allowing students to become co-creator and co-interpreter of information, the analysis presents richer knowledge on how learning environments such as senior high school classrooms and grounds can be transformed into inclusive educational settings. Although it was easy to collect data, the source which is in the form of documents could be incomplete and limited the researchers in probing information that needed clarification. Inclusive research is crucial in understanding epistemic diversity, which is a domain in the Philippine Professional Standards for Teachers (PPST). This allows teachers and learners to further view education with greater consideration of their acquired knowledge and where everyone in the learning process benefits.

References

Bahng, E., & Lee, M. (2017). Learning experiences and practices of elementary teacher candidates on the use of emerging technology: A grounded theory approach. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 10(2), 225-241. doi:10.26822/iejee.2017236118

Bell, S. (2010). Project-based learning for the 21st century: Skills for the future. The Clearing House, 83, 39-43. doi: 10.1080/00098650903505415

Cammarota, J. & Romero, A. (2011). Participatory action research for high school students: transforming policy, practice, and the personal with social justice education. Educational Policy, 25(3), 488-506. doi: 10.1177/0895904810361722

Carrington, S., MacArthur, J., Kearney, A., Kimber, M., Mercer, L., Morton, L., & Rutherford, G. (2013). Towards an inclusive education for all. In S. Carrington & J. MacArthur (Eds.), Teaching in inclusive school communities. Queensland: John Wiley.

Cooperrider, D. L., & Srivastva, S. (1987). Appreciative inquiry in organizational life. Research in Organizational Change and Development, 1, 126-169. Retrieved from www.researchgate,net.

Dimmock, C. (2016). Conceptualising the Research–Practice–Professional Development Nexus: Mobilising Schools as ‘Research-engaged’ Professional Learning Communities. Professional Development in Education, 42(1), 36-53. doi:10.1080/19415257.2014.963884

Hew, K. F., & Cheung, W. S. (2013). Use of Web 2.0 technologies in K-12 and higher education: The search for evidence-based practice. Educational Research Review, 9, 47-64. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2012.08.001

Jimoyiannis, A., Tsiotakis, P., Roussinos, D., & Siorenta, A. (2013). Preparing teachers to integrate Web 2.0 in school practice: Toward a framework for pedagogy 2.0. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 29(2), 248-267. doi: 10.14742/ajet.157

Kane, R., & Chimwayange, C. (2014). Teacher action research and student voice: Making sense of learning in secondary school. Action Research, 12(1), 52-77. doi:10.1177/1476750313515282

Konza, D. M., & 77-86. (2012). Researching in schools: Ethical issues. International Journal of the Humanities, 9(6), 77-86. Retrieved from http://ro.ecu.edu.au/ecuworks2012/2224.

Magnuson, M. L. (2013). Web 2.0 and information literacy instruction: Aligning technology with ACRL standards. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 39(3), 244-251. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2013.01.008

Nind, M. (2014). Inclusive research and inclusive education: Why connecting them makes sense for teachers’ and learners’ democratic development of education. Cambridge Journal of Education, 44(4), 525-540. doi:10.1080/0305764X.2014.936825

Philippine Department of Education [DepEd]. (2017). National Adoption and Implementation of the Philippine Professional Standards for Teachers. (DO No.42, s. 2017). Philippines: Department of Education Retrieved from http://www.deped.gov.ph.

Robinson, V. (2013). Reducing the research-practice gap through problem-based methodology. In A. D. Reid, E. P. Hart & M. A. Peters (Eds.). A companion to research in education (pp. 341-352). Dordrecht: Springer.

Serrat, O. (2017). Appreciative inquiry. Knowledge Solutions. 595-598. doi: 10.1007/978-981-10-0983-9_63

Sutter, W. N. (2014). Qualitative data, analysis, and design. In Introduction to Educational Research: A Critical Thinking Approach (pp. 342-386): SAGE Publications, Inc. doi: 10.4135/9781483384443

Stoner, J. (2015). Chapter 2 Qualitative research in education: Other methods of seeking knowledge. In Current Issues and Trends in Special Education: Research, Technology, and Teacher Preparation (pp. 19-39). doi: 10.1108/S0270-4013(2010)0000020005

Thornberg, R. (2012a). A grounded theory of collaborative synchronizing in relation to challenging students. Urban Education, 47(1), 312-342. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0042085911427735

Thornberg, R. (2012b). Informed grounded theory. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 56(3), 243-259.

Ulla, M. B., Barrera, K. B., & Acompanado, M. M. (2017). Philippine classroom teacher as researchers: Teacher’s perceptions, motivations and challenges. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 42(11), 52-64. doi:10.14221/ajte.2017v42n11.4

Downloads

Published

2021-09-01