The Sisyphic Destiny of Philosphy (of Education)
AbstractAuthors begin by a synthetic historical review of the emergence of the philosophy of education up to the present day. It follows a presentation of the results of recent meta-analyses on the topics, problems, guidelines and relevance given to the philosophy of education (PE). For this purpose, several paths were chosen: one, more empirical, focused on the works developed within the field; the other, more foundational, sought a disciplinary sense within the field’s tradition and the current challenges that are being raised. Authors then outline some of the paths that can be opened up for the philosophy of education, understood as a critical and creative quest. Namely, they try to show how it may be understood as a creation of concepts, in a stance to rip Chaos, by introducing an innovative intensity, which can correspond to the creation of meaning that opens and articulates a possible world (of meaning). Complementary to this, PE could take charge of the analysis of educational discourses, the suggestion of a general direction for the educational process, the elucidation of the human’s educating structure, the explanation of the different pedagogies through the unveiling of their underlying teleology, the recollection of interesting philosophical questions for educators, or a metaphysical analysis of related issues, as well as an analytic approach, aimed at clarifying concepts, or a radical approach, by reflecting upon the deep assumptions of education, and even a deductive approach derived from the great philosophical matrices. Philosophy of education remains, nowadays, a field of hermeneutic openness that should assume the stance of resistance to any attempts to stifle or silence the axiological dimension, and very particularly, PE could be developed as a way of probing the concrete educational practice activity, by engaging in discussions, in order to make suggestions about “what was valuable in the past” and “what is worthwhile in the present”. Today, perhaps more than ever, PE requires the critical work and commitment that philosophy always had the virtue of incisively developing, particularly when it comes to the field of education that is proven to be a multi-layered arena of conflicting crossovers. Keywords: Education; philosophy; assignments; goals
Amilburu, M. G. & Gutiérrez, J. G. (2012). Filosofía de la educación: Cuestiones de hoy y de siempre. Madrid: Narcea/UNED.
Cabanas, J. M. Q. (1988). Teoría de la educación: Concepción antinómica de la educación. Madrid: Editorial Dykinson.
Carvalho, A. D. (1988). Epistemologia das ciências da educação. Porto: Edições Afrontamento.
Chambliss, J. J. (2009). Philosophy of education today. Educational Theory, 59(2), 233-251. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-5446.2009.00316.x
Comissão Europeia (1995). Livre blanc sur l'éducation et la formation. Enseigner et Apprendre. Vers la Société Cognitive. Obtained on 27.06.2005 from http://europa.eu.int/comm/education/doc/official/keydoc/lb-fr.pdf
Deleuze, G. & Guattari, F. (1994). What is philosophy? New York: Columbia University Press.
Fadigas, N. (2003) Inverter a educação: de Gilles Deleuze à filosofia da educação. Porto: Porto Editora.
Fullat, O. (1992). Filosofías de la educación. Barcelona: CEAC.
Fullat, O. (1988). La peregrinación del mal. Bellaterra: Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona.
Gonzálvez, V. (2010) Hacia una reconstrucción de la Razón pedagógica. Teoría de la Educación, 22(2), 19-42.
Habermas, J. (1987). Técnica e ciência como ideologia. Lisboa: Edições 70.
Hayden, M. J. (2012). What do philosophers of education do? An empirical study of philosophy of education journals. Studies of Philosophy and Education, 31, 1-27.
Herrerías, G. L. (2009a). Nueva carta sobre el humanismo. Madrid: Asociación Española de Educación Ambiental.
Herrerías, G. L. (2009b). Diferentes sujetos, diferente educación: Del humano sustancia racional al gramatical ético. In A. Dujo, J. Boavida, & V. Bento, (Coords.), Educação: Reconfiguração e limites das suas fronteiras (pp. 59-93). Guarda: Centro de Estudos Ibéricos.
Ibañez-Martin, J. A. (1984). Filosofía de la educación. In Diccionario de ciencias de la educación. Madrid: Anaya.
Kant, I. (1985). Crítica da razão pura. Lisboa: Fundação Calouste Gulbenkian.
Kant, I. (2003). Pedagogía. Madrid: Akal Ediciones.
Noddings, N. (2012). Philosophy of Education. Boulder, Westview Press.
Ordine, N. (2017). The usefulness of the useless. Paul Dry Books.
Satterthwaite, J. (2011). Truths and values: education in a cynical and sceptical society. In J. Satterthwaite, H. Piper, P. Sikes, & S. Webster (Eds.), Trust in Education: Truths and Values (pp. 3-28). Sterling: Trentham Books.
Savater, F. (1997). O valor de educar. Lisboa: Editorial Presença.
Smeyers, P. (2010). Repensar la filosofía de la educación. Teoría de la Educación, 22(1) 91-116. http://dx.doi.org/10.14201/ted.7133
Sośnicka, J. (Ed.) (2019). An engineer with a humanistic's soul: Humanistic issues of technological world. Lodz: Lodz University Of technology Press.
Standish, P. (2003). The nature and purposes of education. In R Curren (Ed.), A Companion to the Philosophy of Education (pp. 221-231). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
Wortham, S. (2011). What does philosophy have to offer education and who should be offering it. Educational Theory, 61(6), 727-741. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-5446.2011.00430.x
Submission of an article implies that the work described has not been published previously (except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture or academic thesis), that it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere, that its publication is approved by all authors and tacitly or explicitly by the responsible authorities where the work was carried out, and that, if accepted, will not be published elsewhere in the same form, in English or in any other language, without the written consent of the Publisher. The Editors reserve the right to edit or otherwise alter all contributions, but authors will receive proofs for approval before publication.
Copyrights for articles published in International Journal of Curriculum and Instruction are retained by the authors, with first publication rights granted to the journal. The journal/publisher is not responsible for subsequent uses of the work. It is the author's responsibility to bring an infringement action if so desired by the author.