Strategic approaches to glocalising curriculum practice: Responding to faculty development needs and circumstances in diverse university contexts

Strategic approaches to glocalising curriculum practice



University campuses around the world face significant challenges for engaging culturally diverse faculty and students with responsive programming (e.g., undergraduate, graduate, staff and faculty development programs). Policy documents espousing inclusion and the strategic institutional importance of local and global engagement, for example, are positive steps to foster institutional change. However, in practice, ad-hoc curricula renewal initiatives aimed at facilitating cultural diversity tend to be far less strategic, and with scant attention to research-informed and evidence-based scholarship. This paper attempts to address these complex challenges and provides insights toward a scholarly approach to glocalising curriculum practice for faculty development in multinational settings. In this context, data suggests that strategic institutional supports are key to glocalising curriculum practices. Further, a glocalised curriculum is inherently situated; socially and culturally mediated; and, is responsive to the professional learning needs and circumstances of educational leaders in diverse institutional contexts.


Altbach, P.G. and Knight, J. (2007). The internationalization of higher education: Motivations and realities. Journal of Studies in International Education, 11(3-4), 290-305. doi: 10.1177/1028315307303542

Badry, F., & Willoughby, J. (2015). Higher education revolutions in the gulf: Globalization and institutional viability (24). New York: Routledge.

Beelen, J., & Jones, E. (2015). Redefining internationalization at home. In A.Curaj, L. Matei, R. Princopie, J. Salmi, & P. Scott (Eds.). The European higher education area: Between critical reflections and future policies. (pp. 59-72). Cham: Springer.

Breslow, K., Crowell, L., Francis, L., & Stephen, P. (2015). Initial efforts to coordinate Appreciative Inquiry: Facilitators’ experiences and perceptions. i.e.: inquiry in Education, 6(1), Article 4. Available online

Bryk A. S., Gomez L. M., & Grunow, A. (2011). Getting ideas into action: Building networked improvement communities in education. In M. T. Hallinan (Ed.), Frontiers in Sociology of Education (pp. 127-162). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.

Burt, H., & Hubball, H. T. (2014). The scholarship of curriculum leadership: The art, science and politics of faculty engagement. International Journal for University Teaching and Faculty Development, 5(4), 203-218.

Bygrave, C., Asik-Dizdar, O., & Kaur Saini, G. (2014). From homogeneity to heterogeneity: the multicultural future of higher education. On the Horizon, 22(3), 199-209.

Cockell, J., & McArthur-Blair, J. (2012). Appreciative inquiry in higher education: A transformative force: San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons.

Coe, R., Waring, M., & Hedges, L. (2017). Research methods and methodologies in education (2nd Edition). London, UK: Sage.

Friedman, V. J. (2008). Action science: Creating communities of inquiry in communities of practice. In P. Reason & H. Bradbury (Eds.), Handbook of action research: The concise paperback edition (pp. 131-143). Thousand Oaks, CA, USA: Sage Publications.

Gay, G. (2000). Culturally responsive teaching: Theory, research, and practice. New York: Teachers College Press.

Godwin, S.M. (2006). Globalization, Education and Emiratization: A Case Study of the United Arab Emirates. The Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries, 27(1), 1-14, Available online

Harrison, N. (2015). Practice, problems and power in ‘internationalisation at home’: critical reflections on recent research evidence. Teaching in Higher Education, 20(4), 412-430.

Houston, M., & Lebeau, Y. (2006). The social mediation of university learning. Project Report. York, U.K.: Higher Education Academy.

Hubball, H. T., Clarke, A., & Pearson, M. L. (2016). Strategic leadership development in research-intensive higher education contexts: The Scholarship of Educational Leadership. In P. Tripathi & S. Mukerji (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Administration, Policy, and Leadership in Higher Education. (pp. 1-19). Hershey, P.A.: IGI Global. doi: 10.4018/978-1-5225-0672-0.ch001

Hubball, H. T., Clarke, A., Chng, H. H., & Grimmett, P. (2015). The scholarship of educational leadership in research-intensive university contexts: Implications for promotion and tenure supervision. Asian Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 5(2), 92-107.

Hubball, H. T., Clarke, A., Webb, A., & Johnson, B. (2015). Developing institutional leadership for the scholarship of teaching and learning: Lessons learned with senior educational leaders in multinational research-intensive university settings. International Journal for University Teaching and Faculty Development, 4(4).

Hubball, H.T., & Gold, N. (2007). The Scholarship of Curriculum Practice and undergraduate program reform: Theory-practice integration. In P. Wolfe and J. Christensen Hughes (eds.) Curriculum Development in Higher Education: Faculty-Driven Processes & Practices. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 112, 5-14. San Francisco, C.A.: Jossey-Bass Publishers.

John, B., Caniglia, G., Bellina, L., Lang, D., & Laubichler, M. (2017). The glocal curriculum. A practical Guide to Teaching and Learning in an Interconnected World. Hamburg: Tredition.

Jones, E., Coelen, R., Beelen, J., & de Wit, H. (Eds.). (2015). Global and local internationalization. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Springer.

Kreber, C. (2009). Different perspectives on internationalization in higher education. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 118, 1–14.

Ladson-Billings, G. (2014). Culturally relevant pedagogy 2.0: a.k.a the remix. Harvard Educational Review, 84(1), 74-84.

Lave, J. & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.

Lawrie, G., Marquis, E., Fuller, E., Newman, T., Oiu, M., Nomikoudis, M., Roelofs, F., & van Dam, L. (2017). Moving towards inclusive learning and teaching: A synthesis of recent literature. Teaching Learning Inquiry, 5(1), 1-13. Available online

Lomer, S. (2018). UK policy discourses and international student mobility: the deterrence and subjectification of international students. Globalisation, Societies & Education, 16 (3), 308-324. Available online

McLeod, P. & Steinert, Y. (2015). Twelve tips for curriculum renewal. Medical teacher, 37(3), 232-238.

Mannion G (2015) Towards glocal pedagogies: Some risks associated with education for global citizenship and how glocal pedagogies might avoid them. In J. Friedman, V. Haverkate, B. Oomen, E. Park, & M. Sklad (Eds.). Going glocal in higher education: The theory, teaching and measurement of global citizenship. (pp. 19-34) Middelburg, The Netherlands: University College Roosevelt.

Patel, F., & Lynch, H. (2013). Glocalization as an alternative to internationalization in higher education: Embedding positive glocal learning perspectives. International Journal of Teaching & Learning in Higher Education, 25(2), 223-230.

Pearson, M., & Hubball, H.T. (2012). Scholarly approaches to curricular integration: Theory-practice implications for the health professions. American Journal for Pharmaceutical Sciences Education, 76(10), Article 204.

Roehl Mfa, A., Reddy-Linga, S., Kucko. J, & Prestwood, L. (2013). The importance of teaching cultural awareness in design education: Evidence from interior design. Global Journal of Human Social Science Research, 13(12). Available online

Swailes, S., Al Said, L.G., & Al Fahdi, S. (2010). Localisation policy in Oman: A psychological contracting interpretation. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 25(5), 357–372.

Tien, C.W., & Talley, P. (2012). “Think globally, act locally”: ‘Glocalization’ in Taiwanese higher education. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 3(15), 124-130. Available online

The University of British Columbia. (2018). Shaping UBC’s next century: Strategic plan 2018-2028. Available online

Yun, Y., & Moskal, M. (2019). Missing intercultural engagements in the university experiences of Chinese international students in the U.K. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 49(4), 654-671. doi: 10.1080/03057925.2018.1448259